Experiencias de integración social y calidad arquitectónica en proyectos de vivienda de interés social en Canadá.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada es conocido por su politica de multiculturalidad asi como por las condiciones de calidad de vida que resaltan en sus ciudades. El objetivo de esta investigacion ha sido reconocer los aspectos relevantes en el desarrollo de la vivienda de interes social en Canada y evaluar proyectos significativos arquitectonicamente. La investigacion documental y descriptiva, junto al estudio perceptivo morfo-espacial en sitio, resulto en la documentacion y descripcion de proyectos de viviendas de interes social, ejemplos de la sintesis arquitectonica de politicas publicas dirigidas a dar respuestas al problema de vivienda de interes social. Se concluye que para garantizar la calidad de vida es importante incorporar conceptos y criterios de integracion arquitectonica espacial y funcional propiciando la inclusion social, contribuyendo asi al desarrollo sostenible y la integracion multicultural. Se destaca el interesante concepto de mezcla de tipologias de vivienda como estrategia de inclusion social y la planificacion de proyectos basados en las nece sidades especiales de los diversos grupos sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".