MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1487377373 · doi:10.1109/pess.2001.970208

From problem formulation to computer language based implementation

2001· article· en· W1487377373 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftware engineeringSoftwareSoftware Engineering Process GroupSocial software engineeringSoftware requirementsSoftware systemPower engineeringEngineering managementPower (physics)Software constructionElectric power systemEngineeringProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper targets software engineering education in both graduate and undergraduate courses for power system engineers. Its objective is to provide ideas for improving the level of training of power system engineers in the power system software engineering area. It is stressed that engineers should be trained to have a systematic approach to problem solving. Students should be exposed to software engineering as soon as possible. By developing software and creating problem solution algorithms, students can understand the most complex concepts in the underlying system engineering. It is important to learn about available possibilities and to learn how actual professional tools are created and what are the limitations. It is recommended to significantly increase the usage of software engineering topics in power systems for attracting students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207