Automated Extraction of Swallowing Sounds Using a Wavelet-Based Filter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an automated and objective method for extraction of swallowing sounds in a record of the tracheal breath and swallowing sounds. The proposed method takes advantage of the fact that swallowing sounds have more non-stationarity comparing with breath sounds and have large components in many wavelet scales whereas wavelet transform coefficients of breath sounds in higher wavelet scales are small. Therefore, a wavelet transform based filter was utilized in which a multiresolution decomposition-reconstruction process filters the signal. Swallowing sounds are detected in the filtered signal. The proposed method was applied to the tracheal sound recordings of 15 healthy and 11 dysphagic subjects. The results were validated manually by visual inspection using airflow measurement and spectrogram of the sounds and auditory means. Experimental results prove that the proposed method is more accurate, efficient, and objective than the methods proposed previously. Swallowing sound detection may be employed in a system for automated swallowing assessment and diagnosis of swallowing disorders (dysphagia) by acoustical means.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".