MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1487657221 · doi:10.14574/ojrnhc.v13i1.216

“You have to rely on everyone and they on you”: Interdependence and the team-based rural nursing preceptorship

2013· article· en· W1487657221 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueOnline Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthosPhotovoiceNursingContext (archaeology)TeamworkNarrativeRural healthNurse educationMedicineMedical educationPsychologySociologyRural areaPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose A photovoice study was conducted to construct a narrative of teaching and learning to nurse in rural settings as seen through the eyes of nursing students and their preceptors. This article explores the rural context of team-based preceptorship; that is, how interdependence characterizes the quality of the transition from student to professional support networks, and in particular how professional, team-based networks function in rural settings. Methods Photovoice is a participatory research method wherein participants document their lived reality through photography, and supply narrative context to the photographs through group discussion. Four students and their four preceptors, based at health care sites in rural Western Canada, were supplied with digital cameras with which they took over 800 photographs over a ten-week preceptorship course. Preceptors and students were active participants in generating the thematic data analysis. Findings The central thesis of this project was that rural nurses bring a strong sense of community ethos to clinical practice. One aspect of this community ethos was the importance of the rural health care team in precepting a nursing student. Students experienced a transition from their urban, school-based networks to rural-based, professional networks; preceptors and the interdisciplinary team supported students through this transition. As students gained independence from the university and emerged from their student status, they were integrated into the rural interdisciplinary team and community, greatly facilitating their transition to graduate nursing practice. Conclusions More than any other single aspect of rural nursing, we feel teamwork (and community ethos, by extension) is the key to promoting rural preceptorships and rural careers. This model for preceptorship has implications for selecting rural placements and may be transferable to other settings. Ultimately, this knowledge can be used to strengthen student placements in rural areas with implications for the recruitment and retention of nurses in rural areas.Key Words: Photovoice, Rural Preceptorship, Participatory Research Method

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.244
GPT teacher head0.585
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it