MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1487692932 · doi:10.4000/remi.6997

Citoyenneté et rituels funéraires des immigrants. Le cas de migrants congolais au Canada

2014· article· fr· W1487692932 on OpenAlex
Mambo Tabu Masinda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue européenne de migrations internationales · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsBurnaby HospitalBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesEthnologyArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette note de recherche porte un regard sur la citoyenneté des immigrants sous l’angle de la justice sociale qu’apporte la reconnaissance de leurs rituels funéraires en tant que fait culturel. L’auteur soutient que la non-reconnaissance des rituels funéraires des immigrants constitue une atteinte à leur citoyenneté. La discussion porte sur le bris des rites funéraires des Canadiens d’origine congolaise à la suite du refus du gouvernement d’accorder un visa temporaire pour permettre à un membre de la famille restée au Congo de venir compléter avec les Canadiens d’origine congolaise les cérémonies funéraires tel que l’exige leur culture. La discussion permet de montrer que le devoir de reconnaissance culturelle est un outil qui permet d’assurer à tous les citoyens et citoyennes, quels que soient leurs origines culturelles et leurs statuts socioéconomiques, la justice sociale dont ils ont besoin pour se sentir valorisés et intégrés dans leurs sociétés d’accueil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it