Citoyenneté et rituels funéraires des immigrants. Le cas de migrants congolais au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette note de recherche porte un regard sur la citoyenneté des immigrants sous l’angle de la justice sociale qu’apporte la reconnaissance de leurs rituels funéraires en tant que fait culturel. L’auteur soutient que la non-reconnaissance des rituels funéraires des immigrants constitue une atteinte à leur citoyenneté. La discussion porte sur le bris des rites funéraires des Canadiens d’origine congolaise à la suite du refus du gouvernement d’accorder un visa temporaire pour permettre à un membre de la famille restée au Congo de venir compléter avec les Canadiens d’origine congolaise les cérémonies funéraires tel que l’exige leur culture. La discussion permet de montrer que le devoir de reconnaissance culturelle est un outil qui permet d’assurer à tous les citoyens et citoyennes, quels que soient leurs origines culturelles et leurs statuts socioéconomiques, la justice sociale dont ils ont besoin pour se sentir valorisés et intégrés dans leurs sociétés d’accueil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".