MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1487827634 · doi:10.4000/pistes.2556

Travail d’organisation du lean manufacturing et santé : à la source des risques

2012· article· fr· W1487827634 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sébastien Bruère

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Supply Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLean manufacturingHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyOperations managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de cet article est de mettre au débat une réflexion sur les liens entre la santé au travail et la manière dont est menée la constitution de l’organisation de la production « lean manufacturing ». À travers une revue de la littérature, nous avons pu relever, par le passé, un certain nombre de dispositifs organisationnels du lean ayant des effets paradoxaux sur la santé. Dans cet ouvrage, nous cherchons, de manière théorique, des pistes pour agir sur le travail d’organisation qui conduit à ces effets paradoxaux lors de la mise en œuvre des dispositifs. Au cours de cette recherche, nous constatons que le lean dispose de cadres, d’un prescrit, à l’acte d’organiser. Ces cadres sont, eux-mêmes, porteurs d’effets paradoxaux quant au travail et à la santé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santéSame topicQuality and Supply ManagementFrench-language works237,207