MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1487963256 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.2003.1235779

Capability of classifying vowels with a residual excited linear prediction (RELP) vocoder

2004· article· en· W1487963256 on OpenAlexafffund
Akihiro Taguchi, Kunio Takaya, A. Saadat-Mehr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpeech recognitionComputer scienceVowelSpeech codingSpeech processingResidualAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The residual excited linear prediction (RELP) vocoder is a speech codec of good voice quality and a moderate bit rate of 9.6 Kbps for digital communication. However, the RELP does not positively utilize the parameterized speech information to identify speech contents and to determine what word was spoken. This paper proposes a method to classify the vowels in human speech by the RELP vocoder. The method analyzes the frequency response of the LPC filter whose parameters are obtained from a segment of the vowel contained in speech signal. Using the average vectors of frequency response with respect to each vowel sound, mutual Euclidian distances among the vowels were studied. Observed clear separation among the vowels suggests added capability of speech recognition to the RELP vocoder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207