MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488140594 · doi:10.1002/9781118504956.ch1

Current and Emerging Trends in the Formulation and Manufacture of Nutraceuticals and Functional Food Products

2014· other· en· W1488140594 on OpenAlexaff
Alberta N. A. Aryee, Joyce I. Boye

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNutraceuticalHealth benefitsBiotechnologyFunctional foodBusinessLiberian dollarFood industryHuman healthFood productsEnvironmental healthMedicineFood scienceBiologyTraditional medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nutraceuticals and/or functional foods are a fast-growing, multi-billion-dollar global industry that has been expanding annually. This chapter provides an overview of nutraceuticals and functional foods, and discusses their classification and benefits. Bioactive components in functional food and nutraceutical products are naturally found in plants, animals, bacteria, fungi, and microalgae, and their primary and secondary metabolites. When health benefits are proven, these natural food sources could serve as natural substitutes for synthetic pharmaceutical products for intervention purposes and to prevent potential adverse effects from the use of some pharmaceutical drugs. Epidemiological and clinical studies across multiple geographical locations have generally shown neutral or beneficial effects of the consumption of certain types of foods on health and wellness and reduction of risk factors for certain diseases. Further innovation and introduction of products with well-substantiated health claims are therefore anticipated in the coming decades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingFrench-language works237,207