MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W148816068

Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.

2009· article· en· W148816068 on OpenAlexaff
Sara A. Alfadda, Nikolai Attard, Lesley A. David

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDentistryImplantPatient satisfactionDental prosthesisOrthodonticsSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The aim of this report is to present the clinical and patient-based outcomes of an immediate-loading protocol of TiUnite implants with mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients 5 years following initial placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised two groups of edentulous patients. In the experimental group, 35 consecutively treated patients received 70 TiUnite implants that were loaded immediately, as well as 69 Branemark machined implants as a backup treatment. One patient received one Branemark implant. The control group comprised patients who were treated previously with conventional two-stage implant procedures, but were all case matched to the intervention group and served as a historical cohort. This group included 42 patients who received 111 Branemark implants. Both groups of patients were treated with overdentures that were supported with a standardized resilient bar mechanism. Clinical and patient-based outcomes in the immediate group were recorded for the first 5 years following the initial placement of implants and were measured at various stages of treatment using two questionnaires: the Denture Satisfaction Scale and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20). RESULTS: Just over 98% of implants were found to be successful in both groups (Fisher exact test: P = 1.000). A statistically significant improvement in patients' total, mandibular, and functional satisfaction scores was found when comparing baseline data to the data obtained 5 years following loading in the experimental group (P < .001). There were no significant differences between the 1- and 5-year total, mandibular, and functional satisfaction scores, or between baseline and 5-year maxillary denture satisfaction scores. A statistically significant and positive correlation was found between baseline and 1-year maxillary satisfaction scores (P = .002). Any improvement in the patients' quality of life (QoL) was maintained during the first 5 years of loading. CONCLUSION: The results of this longitudinal study suggest that immediate loading of two dental implants by means of bar-retained mandibular overdentures is a predictable treatment option and leads to substantial improvement in patients' satisfaction and QoL. Importantly, this mirrors the outcomes found for patients subjected to the more commonly accepted two-stage implant procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicDental Implant Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207