Regulation of CD8 Expression in Mast Cells by Exogenous or Endogenous Nitric Oxide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We recently reported a novel CD8 molecule on rat alveolar macrophages and peritoneal mast cells (PMC). However, little is known about the regulation of CD8 expression and function on these cells. We investigated the regulation of CD8 expression on PMC by NO, because NO can regulate inflammatory responses and also because anti-CD8 Ab stimulates inducible NO synthase and NO production by PMC and alveolar macrophages. Ligation of CD8alpha on PMC with Ab (OX8) induced CD8alpha mRNA expression after 3-6 h, and flow cytometry demonstrated that OX8 treatment increased CD8alpha protein expression compared with PMC treated with isotype control IgG1. To test whether NO mediates the up-regulation of CD8alpha, we used the NO donor S-nitrosoglutathione (500 microM) and NO synthase inhibitors (N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine and N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; 100 microM). S-nitrosoglutathione up-regulated both mRNA and protein expression of CD8alpha in PMC compared with that in sham-treated cells, while NO synthase inhibitors down-regulated OX8 Ab-induced CD8alpha expression. To investigate how NO regulates CD8 expression on PMC, we examined the cGMP-dependent pathway using 8-bromo-cGMP (2 mM) and the guanylate cyclase inhibitor, 1H-oxadiazoloquinoxalin-1-one (20 microM). 8-Bromo-cGMP up-regulated CD8 expression, whereas 1H-oxadiazoloquinoxalin-1-one down-regulated its expression. Thus, ligation of CD8 up-regulates CD8 expression on PMC, a response mediated at least in part by NO through a cGMP-dependent pathway. The significance of this up-regulation of CD8alpha on mast cells (MC) is unclear, but since ligation of CD8 on MC with OX8 Ab can alter gene expression and mediator secretion, up-regulation of CD8 may enhance the MC response to natural ligation of this novel form of CD8.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".