MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488177014

A 0.8V, 9ns, 0.77mW at 50MHz, 128kb, four-way, set-associative, 2-level CMOS cache memory using two-stage WLOTC/BLOTC tag-compare scheme and sense wordlines/bitlines (SWL/SBL) tag sense amps with an 8-T tag cell in level 2 and a 10-T shrunk logic swing (SLS) memory cell with the ground/floating (G/F) data sense amp in level 1

2001· article· en· W1488177014 on OpenAlexaff
J.B. Kuo, Perng-Fei Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Solid-State Circuits Conference · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSense amplifierCMOSSense (electronics)CacheMemory cellCPU cacheDissipationComputer hardwareSemiconductor memoryElectronic engineeringParallel computingElectrical engineeringVoltageEngineeringTransistorPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a 0.8V, 128Kb, four-way, set-associative, 2-level CMOS cache memory using a novel two-stage WLOTC/BLOTC tag-compare scheme and sense wordlines/bitlines (SWL/SBL) tag sense amps with an 8-T tag cell in level 2 and a 10-T shrunk logic swing (SLS) memory cell with the ground/floating (G/F) data sense amp in level 1 for high-speed operation. Owing to the reduced loading at the sense word-line (SWL) in the new 11-T tag cell in L1 using WLOTC scheme and the split comparison of the index signal in the 8-T tag cells with SWL/SBL tag sense amps and the SLS memory cell with G/F data sense amp in L1, implemented by a 1.8V 0.18µm CMOS technology, this 0.8V cache memory has an L1/L2 hit time of 6ns/11ns at the average power dissipation of 0.77mW at 50MHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.232
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.076 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Solid-State Circuits ConferenceSame topicNetwork Packet Processing and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207