Debljina je bolest – hrana može biti i lijek; provođenje pilot-projekta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: To analyze the eating habits, lifestyles, family anamnesis, assessing the nutrition status through specially aimed physical - out of schedule examinations, and suggest preventive intervention programs in elementary school students. Methods: This research was conducted throughout the year 2008. In the 7 elementary schools in the town Rijeka. The sample presents 496 pupils in the age of 12. The examination contained anamnesis, family anamnesis, measuring height and weight, calculating Body Mass Index (BMI), Waist Hip Ratio (WHR), measuring the skin fold and blood pressure. Results: centile distribution and BMI show that 15,2 % of pupils is overweight and 3,4 % is on the edge of obesity or obese. At the same time, one quarter of pupils think that they are overweight. Almost one third of the young (31 %) in this vulnerable period of development is not having a breakfast, girls more often than boys. One quarter of examinees never or just once a week eats 1 portion of vegetables and 10 % of children never eat fruit. Dairy drinks were never consumed by 6 % of pupils, while 11 % to 20 % of them sometimes consume alcoholic drinks (twice a month up to twice a week). Fast food is consumed 4 times a week, up to every day 13 % of pupils, while 63 % do so once a week. In the last 7 days more then 34 pupils were physically active at least 1 hour a day. Almost the same number of examinees spends 4 and more hours daily watching TV and playing video or computer games. Conclusion: There is a correlation of overweight and obesity in childhood and grown up age. Therefore, the programs of primary prevention that include promotion of healthy lifestyle, healthy and energy – balanced nutrition, moderate physical activity, reorganization of school kitchens and controlled menus is important to perform right in that, very vulnerable period of growing up. Intervention should be careful and paced because the young people in that period are coping with irrational experience of themselves and their bodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".