MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488391777 · doi:10.7202/1018183ar

Une entrevue d’Hubert Aquin avec Aldous Huxley : Premier plan, 12 juin 19601

2013· article· fr· W1488391777 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Nino Gabrielli

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobe Revue internationale d’études québécoises · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente une entrevue inédite d’Hubert Aquin avec l’écrivain britannique Aldous Huxley, réalisée dans le cadre de l’émission Premier plan du 12 juin 1960 à la télévision de Radio-Canada. L’analyse des contextes de production, de diffusion et de réception de l’entrevue, située dans le corpus des grands entretiens réalisés en 1960 par Hubert Aquin, permet de mieux saisir l’impact de la carrière journalistique sur la formation intellectuelle de l’écrivain, du militant politique et de l’homme des médias. La réémergence du patrimoine médiatique aquinien, grâce à la nouvelle accessibilité de plusieurs dizaines de documents audiovisuels à l’Université de Montréal, est finalement soulignée, laissant entrevoir de nouvelles perspectives d’études de l’oeuvre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobe Revue internationale d’études québécoisesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207