MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488657516

Church of Saints and Sinners

2013· article· en· W1488657516 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America (Catholic Theological Society of America) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Freedom and Discrimination
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contrasting visions of holiness are refl ected in differing practices of canonization and theological understandings of the mark of the holiness the church.Exploring Roman Catholic and Anglican processes for the canonization of saints, Scott Sharman presented a paper entitled, "Ecumenical Hagiography: Ecclesiologies of Roman Catholic and Anglican 'Saint-Making'," suggests the need for the development of an "ecumenical hagiography."The calendar of saints of the Roman Catholic Church, in particular as adapted by the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, was contrasted to the calendar established by the Episcopal Church USA-a province of the wider Anglican communion.The 2009 General Convention of ECUSA approved a revision of the liturgical calendar for trial use, Holy Women, Holy Men, to complement the calendar of the Book of Common Prayer.One hundred new commemorations are more ecumenically inclusive and seek to promote a wider recognition of lay holiness and the contributions of women.It includes fi gures as diverse as Copernicus,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.020
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it