MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488724794 · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-044-7_7

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

2010· book-chapter· en· W1488724794 on OpenAlexaff
Frances Tse

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoscopic mucosal resectionMedicineResectionSurgeryGastrointestinal tractDigestive tractInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an advanced endoscopic technique used to resect sessile or flat lesions confined to the superficial layers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which cannot be resected by conventional endoscopic techniques. It is increasingly being recognized as a highly effective and minimally invasive alternative to surgery in the management of superficial early GI cancers. By resection through the middle or deeper part of the submucosal layer, EMR allows complete and curative resection of the diseased mucosa. This can be accomplished with minimal cost, morbidity, and mortality, and with the potential of improving the long-term quality of life of patients. Although EMR is primarily a treatment procedure, it can also be used to obtain larger and deeper tissue biopsies for diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207