Politiques visant la santé au Québec : lorsque la main droite ignore ce que fait la main gauche
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse la cohérence des politiques publiques de santé et de transport au Québec. Il conclut que, tandis que la formulation de ces politiques est cohérente, leur mise en œuvre s’avère incongruente. Ainsi, la politique de santé du Québec vise notamment à réduire les décès et maladies dus à la pollution de l’air, en ligne avec la politique de transport du Québec, laquelle souhaite réduire les émissions des gaz à effet de serre. Or, la mise en œuvre de ces politiques ne permet pas d’atteindre ces objectifs en raison de la densité de la hiérarchie, c’est-à-dire le nombre de hiérarchies (Hupe, 2010). Autrement dit, la décentralisation des deux ministères concourt à une mauvaise interprétation des priorités conjointes des ministères.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".