Los agujeros negros del Marxismo occidental. Respuesta a Dallas Smythe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tras la publicación en el vol. 1, n.º 3 del Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory (otoño de 1977) del artículo de Dallas Smythe sobre los agujeros negros del marxismo occidental, Gram. Mudock elabora en este texto una respuesta a estas ideas. Si bien compartiendo su perspectiva de que hay que devolver a la economía al centro del análisis cultural del marxismo, aborda una serie de críticas. Para ello parte del problema de considerar la situación norteamericana como paradigmática, y se centra en poner de manifiesto sus diferencias con la situación europea. Éstas se reflejan en el énfasis y preocupaciones de las teorizaciones marxistas desarrolladas en Europa. Murdock acusa a Smythe de subestimar la importancia y centralidad del Estado en el capitalismo contemporáneo, de minusvalorar la función independiente del contenido de los medios a la hora de reproducir las ideologías dominantes y de presentar la evolución del sistema de los medios de comunicación de masas en la sociedad como falto de problemáticas concretas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".