MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488808664 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2011.0390

Parameter estimation of periodically switched linear systems

2012· article· en· W1488808664 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Wang, Tongwen Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCorrectnessSequence (biology)Computer scienceLinear systemClass (philosophy)Control theory (sociology)Selection (genetic algorithm)Estimation theoryAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study is concerned with parameter estimation of a special class of switched linear systems (SLSs), namely, periodically switched linear systems (PSLSs). General identification methods that do not explore switching sequence patterns may perform poorly in estimation accuracy and implementation efficiency. In this work, we first analyse input and output (I/O) data sequences and then establish the connection between the periodicity and I/O data sequence. This allows us to obtain an accurate estimation of the switching sequence period p0. We prove that the correctness of data classification is almost surely guaranteed. In implementation, we propose two efficient strategies, namely, the reverse order search and finite data selection, to improve the computational efficiency. Moreover, we provide both offline and online methods to estimate p0 and the parameters. The effectiveness of these methods are demonstrated in simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Control Theory and ApplicationsSame topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207