MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488876622 · doi:10.1109/icdsp.2015.7251320

Adaptive blind widely linear CCM reduced-rank beamforming for large-scale antenna arrays

2015· article· en· W1488876622 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaomin Wu, Yunlong Cai, Rodrigo C. de Lamare, Benoı̂t Champagne, Minjian Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive beamformerComputational complexity theoryAlgorithmRank (graph theory)BeamformingCovariance matrixComputer scienceKrylov subspaceConvergence (economics)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Subspace topologySignal processingInterference (communication)MathematicsIterative methodDigital signal processingTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an adaptive blind reduced-rank beamforming algorithm based on Krylov-subspace (KS) techniques and widely linear (WL) processing for non-circular signals. In contrast to the conventional WL processing approach, the properties of the augmented covariance matrix are exploited to derive a new structured WL beamforming scheme based on the generalized sidelobe canceler (GSC) structure. We develop a recursive least square (RLS) algorithm according to the constrained constant modulus (CCM) criterion to update the reduced-rank beamformer so obtained. A detailed signal-to-interference-plus noise ratio (SINR) analysis and a computational complexity analysis are carried out. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms its linear counterpart and the full-rank algorithms, achieving the best convergence performance among all the analyzed methods with a relatively low complexity.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207