MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488891145 · doi:10.3171/jns.2000.92.6.1056

Origin of the Drake fenestrated aneurysm clip

2000· article· en· W1488891145 on OpenAlexaff
Rolando F. Del Maestro

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClipping (morphology)AneurysmGeorge (robot)SurgeryArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of the Drake fenestrated aneurysm clip is a study in the history of ideas. This communication outlines the conception and solution of a surgical problem involved with the clipping of large basilar tip aneurysms. Dr. Charles G. Drake's ability to modify old ideas and experiment with new ones was instrumental to the conceptual idea of a fenestrated clip. Dr. Frank H. Mayfield and Mr. George Kees, Jr. played essential roles in bringing the idea to a reality. The development of the fenestrated clip has added substantially to the armamentarium of the aneurysm surgeon in dealing with large and complex aneurysms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207