MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488899776 · doi:10.2979/vic.2006.48.4.732

BOOK REVIEW: Edited by Janet Badia and Jennifer Phegley.<b>READING WOMEN: LITERARY FIGURES AND CULTURAL ICONS FROM THE VICTORIAN AGE TO THE PRESENT</b>. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: Toronto University Press, 2005.

2006· article· en· W1488899776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)NewspaperHistoryPaintingLiteratureArt historyArtMedia studiesSociologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Reading Women: Literary Figures and Cultural Icons from the Victorian Age to the Present Patrocinio Schweickart (bio) Reading Women: Literary Figures and Cultural Icons from the Victorian Age to the Present, edited by Janet Badia and Jennifer Phegley; pp. 293. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: Toronto University Press, 2005, $60.00, £40.00. The introduction to Reading Women opens with three epigraphs, all of which describe a line of products—postcards, notecards, and calendars featuring reproductions of nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century paintings of reading women—marketed by Pomegranate Communications. The Pomegranate products testify to the enduring appeal, particularly to educated and professional women, of images of reading women. Janet Badia and Jennifer Phegley's introduction thus establishes the iconic status of the reading woman and sets the stage for eleven essays that "argue that women readers—and our assumptions about them—have been instrumental in the development of literary aesthetics, gender roles, and the very foundation of the current cultural and literary establishments" (15). Eight of the essays explore constructions of reading women in literature, in nineteenth-century paintings, and in Victorian literary magazines; one analyzes depictions of women in the British Museum Reading Room in architectural plans, newspapers, magazines, novels, and journals; and one discusses the television phenomenon of Oprah Winfrey's Book Club. Kate Flint's afterword draws lessons from her own reading history and serves as a graceful coda to the volume. Collectively, the essays trace the evolution of representations of women readers over the last two centuries. Their goal, according to Badia and Phegley, is to fill the gaps left by reader-response studies that focus on what readers do to the exclusion of the "visual and rhetorical construction of readers within their socio-historical contexts" (13), as well as by studies with limited historical range that do not trace the figure of the woman reader to the present day. Three themes are salient in the essays. First, women like to read for a variety of reasons—for entertainment, as temporary respite from daily routine, for intellectual and emotional stimulation, to acquire information about various topics, as a means for self-understanding and transformation. Today, women are the primary consumers of books and magazines and comprise the overwhelming majority of book club members. Second, the woman reader has long been the focus of moral and cultural anxiety. In the nineteenth century, the increasing literacy of women and the widespread availability of books and periodicals gave rise to calls for regulation of the quantity and the content of women's reading, lest they become infected with unsavory ideas and attitudes that undermine their capacity to be good wives and mothers. The woman reader is often eroticized. Reading is coded as seduction: she is seduced by a book, and so susceptible to sexual seduction; she is seductive as a sexual object to men, but more dangerously, as a counter-normative role model for women. Badia's study of the pathological Sylvia Plath/Anne Sexton reader and Barbara Hochman's examination of the "addictive reader" in Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "The Yellow Wallpaper" (1899) carry the theme of unhealthy reading practices forward to the present day. The main danger today, however, is said to be the tendency of women readers to be insufficiently critical. Michele Crescenzo and Tuire Valkeakari explore how African American readers can be damaged by the ideology of white supremacy encoded in the dominant cultural texts. Mary R. Lamb praises Winfrey's Book Club for promoting literacy but faults it for not encouraging "the critical skills necessary for engaging texts fully" (273). [End Page 732] The third theme runs counter to the second. The reading woman is an icon of women's assertion of intellectual and moral autonomy, their demand for equal access to intellectual and professional opportunities, and their struggle for social and political empowerment. Phegley's chapter gives an account of two Victorian magazines, Cornhill and Belgravia, that actively encouraged women to pursue their intellectual ambitions. Ruth Hoberman's study of the changing representations of women in the British Museum Reading Room shows the conflict between women's struggle for equal access to learning, and the recognition early in the twentieth century...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it