MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1488899776 · doi:10.2979/vic.2006.48.4.732

BOOK REVIEW: Edited by Janet Badia and Jennifer Phegley.<b>READING WOMEN: LITERARY FIGURES AND CULTURAL ICONS FROM THE VICTORIAN AGE TO THE PRESENT</b>. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: Toronto University Press, 2005.

2006· article· en· W1488899776 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrocinio Schweickart

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReading (process)NewspaperHistoryPaintingLiteratureArt historyArtMedia studiesSociologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Reading Women: Literary Figures and Cultural Icons from the Victorian Age to the Present Patrocinio Schweickart (bio) Reading Women: Literary Figures and Cultural Icons from the Victorian Age to the Present, edited by Janet Badia and Jennifer Phegley; pp. 293. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: Toronto University Press, 2005, $60.00, £40.00. The introduction to Reading Women opens with three epigraphs, all of which describe a line of products—postcards, notecards, and calendars featuring reproductions of nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century paintings of reading women—marketed by Pomegranate Communications. The Pomegranate products testify to the enduring appeal, particularly to educated and professional women, of images of reading women. Janet Badia and Jennifer Phegley's introduction thus establishes the iconic status of the reading woman and sets the stage for eleven essays that "argue that women readers—and our assumptions about them—have been instrumental in the development of literary aesthetics, gender roles, and the very foundation of the current cultural and literary establishments" (15). Eight of the essays explore constructions of reading women in literature, in nineteenth-century paintings, and in Victorian literary magazines; one analyzes depictions of women in the British Museum Reading Room in architectural plans, newspapers, magazines, novels, and journals; and one discusses the television phenomenon of Oprah Winfrey's Book Club. Kate Flint's afterword draws lessons from her own reading history and serves as a graceful coda to the volume. Collectively, the essays trace the evolution of representations of women readers over the last two centuries. Their goal, according to Badia and Phegley, is to fill the gaps left by reader-response studies that focus on what readers do to the exclusion of the "visual and rhetorical construction of readers within their socio-historical contexts" (13), as well as by studies with limited historical range that do not trace the figure of the woman reader to the present day. Three themes are salient in the essays. First, women like to read for a variety of reasons—for entertainment, as temporary respite from daily routine, for intellectual and emotional stimulation, to acquire information about various topics, as a means for self-understanding and transformation. Today, women are the primary consumers of books and magazines and comprise the overwhelming majority of book club members. Second, the woman reader has long been the focus of moral and cultural anxiety. In the nineteenth century, the increasing literacy of women and the widespread availability of books and periodicals gave rise to calls for regulation of the quantity and the content of women's reading, lest they become infected with unsavory ideas and attitudes that undermine their capacity to be good wives and mothers. The woman reader is often eroticized. Reading is coded as seduction: she is seduced by a book, and so susceptible to sexual seduction; she is seductive as a sexual object to men, but more dangerously, as a counter-normative role model for women. Badia's study of the pathological Sylvia Plath/Anne Sexton reader and Barbara Hochman's examination of the "addictive reader" in Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "The Yellow Wallpaper" (1899) carry the theme of unhealthy reading practices forward to the present day. The main danger today, however, is said to be the tendency of women readers to be insufficiently critical. Michele Crescenzo and Tuire Valkeakari explore how African American readers can be damaged by the ideology of white supremacy encoded in the dominant cultural texts. Mary R. Lamb praises Winfrey's Book Club for promoting literacy but faults it for not encouraging "the critical skills necessary for engaging texts fully" (273). [End Page 732] The third theme runs counter to the second. The reading woman is an icon of women's assertion of intellectual and moral autonomy, their demand for equal access to intellectual and professional opportunities, and their struggle for social and political empowerment. Phegley's chapter gives an account of two Victorian magazines, Cornhill and Belgravia, that actively encouraged women to pursue their intellectual ambitions. Ruth Hoberman's study of the changing representations of women in the British Museum Reading Room shows the conflict between women's struggle for equal access to learning, and the recognition early in the twentieth century...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,100
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,333

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1000,091

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian StudiesMême sujetPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesTravaux en français237 207