Probing the composition of Ge dots and Si∕Si1−xGex island superlattices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We use analytical transmission electron microscopy to map the composition of Ge dot and Si∕Si1−xGex island structures grown on (001) Si by molecular beam epitaxy or ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition. Energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy reveals that nominally pure Ge dots grown by molecular beam epitaxy at 650°C exhibit considerable intermixing with the average Ge composition typically increasing from nearly zero at the base to about 50% at the top of the dot. In pyramid shaped dots, the Ge composition increases linearly up to the top of the dot, while for dome dots, a saturation of the incorporation rate is seen beyond a distance of 7nm from the substrate interface. Probing of Si∕Si1−xGex island superlattices also reveals large Si∕Ge intermixing with a Ge accumulation at the crest and Ge depletion at the troughs of the islands. These results are corroborated by x-ray diffraction and Raman scattering measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".