MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1488958607

Business Cycles in a Small Open Economy with Agency Costs

2002· preprint· en· W1488958607 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benoı̂t Carmichael, Lucie Samson

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2002
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic theories and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsStylized factInvestment (military)ReplicateBalance of tradeOpen economyBusiness cycleAggregate (composite)Spillover effectAutocorrelationEconometricsAgency costVariance (accounting)General equilibrium theoryDebtSmall open economyMonetary economicsMacroeconomicsExchange rateFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Open economy extensions of otherwise typical DGE models have met with some difficulties. It is hard for example to replicate the correlation between output and the trade balance, as well as the variance of the latter variable. The correlation between the trade balance and the terms of trade is also problematic. Capital adjustment costs have been suggested to resolve some of these problems. In this paper, we propose a dynamic general equilibrium model which incorporates asymmetry in information and agency costs as an alternative. The model considers the possibility, associated with Irving Fisher's (1933) "debt-deflation" story of the great depression, that entrepreneurs may be limited in their investment activities by their amount of net worth. This limitation implies that the level of internal financing available for projects will influence aggregate economic activity. The main conclusion is that the proposed model is able to replicate the Canadian stylized facts fairly well. Moreover, compared to a typical DGE model, its predictions regarding the autocorrelation functions of output growth and investment are closer to those observed in the data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics→Same topicEconomic theories and models→French-language works237,207→