Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents the findings of a textual analysis of BBC1 and Channel 4 news coverage of Israel's historic withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in August 2005. Although events could have been framed in a variety of ways, the findings reveal that there was a noticeable bias towards Israel in the coverage of events by both broadcasters and that the Israelis had a far greater news presence than the Palestinians. In particular, there were a higher number of quotes by Israelis than Palestinians. The article also demonstrates that while Channel 4 attempted to provide greater historical and situational context and to undermine the settlers’ position, both broadcasters framed the Gaza withdrawal as an intra-Israeli trauma, effectively disengaging the events from the broader issues relative to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. In so doing, the news reports largely reproduced the Israeli government's preferred version of events, thus the official Israeli perspective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it