Bibliographic record
Abstract
En litterature acadienne, Hermenegilde Chiasson occupe une place essentielle, tant par la qualite que par la quantite de ses ecrits. Ses essais nous permettent de suivre l'evolution de sa pensee, tant dans le domaine de l'art que dans celui de l'affirmation nationale, et d'entrevoir les questions qui ont mobilise l'Acadie. La querelle sur l'identite nationale, le lien entre les artistes acadiens et l'exil, et le refus d'une vision folklorique de l'Acadie sont des themes qui ont marque l'Acadie depuis une trentaine d'annees. Chiasson a provoque un debat sur le role de l'artiste acadien et le besoin d'institutions culturelles proprement acadiennes, controlees a partir de l'Acadie. En prenant la parole et en n'hesitant pas a critiquer l'hegemonie culturelle quebecoise et a stigmatiser la conduite des artistes acadiens a Montreal, Chiasson a exprime l'humiliation ressentie par les artistes des Maritimes, et a mis de l'avant le projet de toute une generation de creer et d'affirmer la valeur d'une Acadie culturelle d'ici et de maintenant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".