L'éclosion de la vocation religieuse chez les soeurs dominicaines de Trois-Rivières : pour un complément aux perspectives de l'historiographie récente
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since 1901, 696 French Canadian women, including the founders, entered the Dominicaines du Rosaire in Trois-Rivieres and the congregation that succeeded it. Of these, 262 intended to remain; some died before making their final vows, while some who professed perpetual vows ended by leaving, in the middle of the 1960s, after living a number of years in the community. This study of the Dominican convent of Trois-Rivieres suggests that the main factors that contributed to encouraging vocations with the Dominicans are not to be found in the women’s social or geographic origins, but rather in the circumstances of their childhood and adolescence, as well as in family or other support for religious life. As well, those entering the convent after 1945 maintain a relationship with their vocation that differs from that of their predecessors. The rich qualitative sources allow the authors to construct a discourse that, without neglecting the role of structural and sociological factors in the awakening of these women’s vocations, also gives place to the more cultural and spiritual dimensions of this choice of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".