Concepção de profissionais de unidades de acolhimento sobre a maternidade em adolescentes abrigadas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estudo descritivo-exploratório que descreve as concepções dos profissionais de abrigo sobre a maternidade da adolescente abrigada e discute a atuação desses profissionais no auxílio à construção de uma maternidade saudável nesse grupo populacional. Analisou-se o conteúdo dos depoimentos de seis profissionais que trabalham com adolescentes institucionalizadas, cuja pesquisa ocorreu no período de dezembro de 2009 a janeiro de 2010. Os profissionais concebem a maternidade nesse grupo como algo precoce e prejudicial devido à imaturidade dessas jovens mães e, também, pela interrupção dos estudos; a atuação destes profissionais alterna-se entre a re-inserção social e cuidados com a maternidade dessas adolescentes. A ação dialógica, a problematização no enfrentamento da maternidade entre estas adolescentes, bem como sobre a saúde reprodutiva, sexual e planejamento familiar são estratégias propositivas para o alcance da promoção da saúde entre adolescentes abrigadas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".