MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1489404434

Jewish Major Leaguers in Their Own Words: Oral Histories of 23 Players

2012· article· en· W1489404434 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
William Harris Ressler

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingJudaismChosePsychologySociologyPsychoanalysisAestheticsSocial psychologyLawPhilosophyTheologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peter Ephross with Martin Abramowitz. Jewish Major Leaguers in Their Own Words: Oral Histories of 23 Players. Jefferson NC: McFarland, 2012. 227 pp. Paper, $35.00. Jewish Major Leaguers in Their Own Words contains twenty-three interviews, conducted by a dozen different interviewers, spanning three decades, but with one clear message. Being a Jewish major leaguer has long meant making choices, often defying expectations of family and community. For some, a career in professional baseball meant eschewing the careers that nice Jewish boys were supposed to pursue. In 1938, for example, Sam Nahem chose to put a law career on hold to play baseball, to his mother's initial chagrin. For most, a career in baseball necessitated making compromises on expressing their Jewish identification, frequently disappointing their parents--with the exception of Mary Rotblatt's father, who was glad when his son chose baseball over an expensive bar mitzvah. Being a Jewish professional baseball player has meant reconciling seemingly incompatible identities and contradictory expectations. It is painful to read how many players felt lonely and guarded around teammates, afraid to react to supposedly harmless but nevertheless latently anti-Semitic remarks for fear of violating clubhouse norms. It is especially heartbreaking to read Saul Rogovin's description of his own conflicted feelings when A1 Rosen challenged Rogovin's anti-Semitic teammate: feeling proud of Rosen (a fellow Jew), feeling disloyal for being proud of Rosen (an opposing player), feeling forced to choose between his two identities, and feeling ashamed for being unable to choose. The archetypal choice, of course, is the choice: whether or not to play on the High Holidays. Players felt pressured by Hank Greenberg's and then Sandy Koufax's iconic choices to sit out important games on Yom Kippur. Jesse Levis, for example, was sitting on the Brewers' bench on Yom Kippur, fasting, when an unknowing manager inserted him as a pinch hitter. Levis failed to get a hit--not only then, but for the rest of the season--a fate he attributed to divine punishment but more likely his internalizing pressures to try to reconcile a career in baseball with Jewish identity expression. Jewish players were also aware of Jewish fans' pride in and expectations of their heroes' choices to honor Jewish tradition, and this, too, was often stressful. Many players internalized a responsibility to increase the numbers of Jews in baseball by inspiring young Jews to take up the game--If Hank Greenberg can become a ballplayer, so can you (39). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207