MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1489421748 · doi:10.1109/esscirc.2003.1257093

Design of high gain fully-integrated distributed amplifiers in 0.35 μm CMOS

2004· article· en· W1489421748 on OpenAlexaff
Rony E. Amaya, Calvin Plett

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistributed amplifierCMOSAmplifierElectrical engineeringInductorGain–bandwidth productBandwidth (computing)Fully differential amplifierDissipationElectronic engineeringEngineeringRF power amplifierOperational amplifierPhysicsTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 3.3V single-supply fully-integrated distributed amplifier was implemented in a standard 0.35 /spl mu/m CMOS process up to 20 dB of gain and a bandwidth of 5.5 GHz. This is the highest reported gain for a CMOS distributed amplifier. Octagonal inductors with no ground shield were implemented in top available metal. Design guidelines for optimizing amplifier gain are presented. Chip dimensions are 0.95 /spl times/ 1.8 mm/sup 2/ and power dissipation is 86.7 mW, drawn from a 3.3V supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207