MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1489428148 · doi:10.1109/cwit.2015.7255155

Database query privacy using homomorphic encryptions

2015· article· en· W1489428148 on OpenAlexaff
Sudharaka Palamakumbura, Hamid Usefi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomomorphic encryptionComputer scienceEncryptionPlaintextCiphertextHomomorphic secret sharingMultiple encryptionProbabilistic encryptionOn-the-fly encryptionScheme (mathematics)Theoretical computer science40-bit encryptionClient-side encryptionComputer securityCryptographyMathematicsSecure multi-party computation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Homomorphic encryption is a novel encryption method for it enables computing over encrypted data. This has a wide range of real world ramifications such as being able to blindly compute a search result sent to a remote server without revealing it's content. In this paper we summarize how SQL queries can be made secure using a homomorphic encryption scheme based on the ideas of Gahi, et al [1]. Gahi's model is based on the DGHV scheme which is a homomorphic encryption scheme which acts on plaintext bits and produce corresponding ciphertext. We use Gahi's blueprint to propose an improved model which is based on the more recent Ring based homomorphic encryption scheme by Braserski, et al [2]. Our method is more general in the sense that it can be extended to use with any fully homomorphic encryption scheme rather than being restricted to the DGHV scheme as in Gahi's method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.010
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207