Report from the International Permafrost Association: Tenth International Conference on Permafrost (TICOP) in Salekhard

The Tenth International Conference on Permafrost (TICOP) was held from 25–29 June 2012 in Salekhard, in the Yamal-Nenets region in Russia. Over 500 participants from more than 25 countries attended the conference to exchange their latest findings in permafrost research and engineering. The title of the conference was Resources and Risks of Permafrost in a Changing World and, indeed, the focus of many presentations was on the impact of global change on perennially frozen ground with a growing interest on how thawing permafrost may affect global change. Many fruitful discussions and meetings took place besides the daily conference programme and helped to foster existing collaborations, as well as to create new joint projects. Thanks to the generous support of the Government of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, 150 young permafrost researchers from many countries were able to join the meeting, give presentations and co-chair sessions. In addition, a special pre-conference workshop with academic presentations and career advice by senior researchers was organised by the Permafrost Young Researchers’ Network (PYRN). The conference opening plenary began with welcoming words and speeches from invited representatives of the local government and Russian academics. The Governor of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, Dmitry Kobylkin, was the first to speak, followed by Sergey Kharyuchi, Chairman of the Legislative Assembly of the Yamal-Nenets region. On behalf of the permafrost community, Hans-Wolfgang Hubberten, President of the International Permafrost Association (IPA), and Vladimir Novoselov from the Tyumen State Oil and Gas University gave short overviews about the state of permafrost research and their expectations for the coming week. Vladimir Melnikov and Aleksander Aseev, academicians from the Russian Academy of Sciences, underlined and confirmed these assessments in their talks. Further speeches were given by Anton Vasilyev (Senior Arctic Official of the Russian Federation to the Arctic Council), Vacheslav Gaizer (Head of the Komi Republic), Björn D. Fagerberg (Councillor of the Embassy of Sweden in the Russian Federation), Philip Nobel (Head of the Nobel dynasty, Head of the International Nobel Foundation) and Aleksander Mazharov (Deputy Governor of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District). In addition, the Head of the Resources Economics Center expressed his interest in the upcoming conference, as well as Nikolay Melnikov, Rector of the Kolsky National Centre, and Vladimir Dubrovin from the Ministry of Natural Resources. An important part of the opening ceremony was the IPA Award for Lifetime Achievement which was presented in absentia to Professor Nikolai N. Romanovskii for his outstanding work and contribution to permafrost research. Frederick E. Nelson, Chair of the IPA Nominations and Awards Committee, read the citation and a video of the awardee offering his thanks was shown to the audience in the auditorium. Each day of the main conference started with two plenary talks, which through the week covered the most important aspects of permafrost research and engineering. The Tuesday keynotes were ‘The terrestrial permafrost carbon budget’ (Guido Grosse, USA) and ‘Recent engineering advances in permafrost regions’ (Victor Razbegin, Russia). On Wednesday, Mikhail Grigoriev (USA) discussed ‘Coastal and subsea permafrost in transition’ and Andrew Slater (USA) presented a lecture on ‘Permafrost and global climate models’. On Thursday, Bernd Etzelmüller (Norway) and Ko van Huissteden (The Netherlands) started the day with their respective presentations ‘Recent advances in mountain permafrost research’ and ‘Thermokarst changes and ecological shifts related to permafrost’. The last plenaries on Friday were given by Hanne Christiansen (Norway) about the ‘State of permafrost – results of the GTN-P (Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost) network’ and by Gonçalo Vieira (Portugal) about ‘Permafrost in the Antarctic’. The plenary presentations were all of exceptionally high quality and set the tone for the rest of the conference. Session 1, Engineering opportunities and issues in permafrost regions, was the largest, with presentations throughout the week and 41 poster contributions. The venues for the talks were spread through a number of buildings in Salekhard within walking distance of each other. All the facilities were very modern with good screens, projectors and computer facilities. During the plenary lectures, as well as in all sessions and during the paper discussions, simultaneous translation was provided from Russian to English and vice versa. This made it possible for all attendees to follow the discussions and to participate in them. Poster sessions were held on Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday in dedicated time slots at the College Complex. These were important contributors to the conference and engendered vigorous discussion. Great efforts were made to publish conference proceedings for all participants and needs. Ken Hinkel made an exceptional contribution in this respect as Editor of International Contributions, as did the 17 Associate Editors. In Russia, editing was carried out by Academician Vladimir Melnikov with co-editors Dmitry Drozdov and Vladimir Romanovsky. A total of five volumes were produced. Volume 1 comprises all international contributions in English (Hinkel, 2012a, 2012b), while volume 2 consists of translations of Russian contributions into English (Melnikov et al., 2012). Volume 3 contains Russian contributions (Melnikov et al., 2012). Volumes 4-1 and 4-2 include all extended abstracts in English including translated versions of Russian abstracts, while volume 5 contains Russian extended abstracts that were submitted in Russian. All five volumes can be downloaded free of charge at http://www.ticop2012.org/important_info/. Holding a permafrost conference on the Arctic Circle, in a city where the inhabitants are continually confronted with problems relating to frozen ground, permits the infrastructure and ecological challenges to be demonstrated directly. Five different local field trips were offered to the conference participants on Thursday afternoon, including an examination of foundation engineering within Salekhard, a visit to a core storage facility, an examination of Yamal natural resources, a trip to the Romantic Glacier in the Ural Mountains and an excursion to explain permafrost soils. Six post-conference field trips took the attendees to many different, interesting places in the region. One field trip went to the Novy Port Permafrost Tunnel, a unique underground storage facility in frozen ground with a total area of more than 100 m2, organised by Konstantin Nikitin. Three expeditions went to the Yamal Peninsula, led by Yuriy Novopoltsev, Marina Leibman and Anna Kurchatova to the Yuribey River Railway Bridge, the Obskaya-Bovanenkovo Railway and the Marre-Sale polar station, respectively, covering the different environments as well as geotechnical challenges in this region. The highlights of these trips included underground ice, the geocryological station Vaskiny Dachi, an ethnic tour to a Nenets community, as well as a visit to the oldest meteorological station in the Russian Arctic. In addition, one trip to the polar Urals in the Gorno-Khodattinsky National Park was offered by Yuriy Zhdanov, where the different types of tundra, glaciological geomorphology and chromite mining in permafrost could be viewed. Finally, a post-conference international field school for 35 young scientists from six countries was organised by Vladimir Sheinkman, Valery Grebenets and Dmitry Streletskiy. The conference included a range of cultural and social events, covering the traditional customs of the indigenous people, the typical food of the region, as well as contemporary versions of the local music and art scene. One highlight was the visit to a Nenets community, where the inhabitants presented their traditional rituals, showed their day-to-day clothes and served some of their country food, such as pieces of frozen fish and caribou stew. During the opening ceremony on Sunday evening, local musicians, singers and dancers delivered an excellent show and surprised the audience with the variety and quality of the performances. Monday evening at an ice-skating rink ended with a splendid dinner provided by the Governor of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District. On the following day, there was a big gathering on the banks of the Ob River to celebrate the ‘first fish celebration’. Beside an abundance of delicious, very fresh fish meals, the Nenets people demonstrated their traditional dances and music. It was also possible to be creative by trying to make some of the typical handcrafts. Another evening highlight was the boat tour on the Ob River held on Wednesday and Thursday. On both evenings, the tour took place under sunny skies that remained blue until very late at night. Participants were able to chat and network while partaking of a buffet and beverages. In addition, specific TICOP resolutions were provided and read by Academician Vladimir Melnikov in Russian. During the closing ceremony, young permafrost researchers received awards for their outstanding oral or poster presentation at the conference. A jury of more than ten senior scientists was in charge of the judging, evaluation and ranking of more than 150 contributions. The entire process was led by Anne Morgenstern from the Alfred-Wegener Institute, supported by Inga May (IPA) as well as by Ken Hinkel (University of Cincinnati) and Fritz Nelson (Chair of the IPA Awards and Nominations Committee). The IPA Council as well as the Executive Committee met twice in association with the conference. The first Executive Committee meeting was held in Moscow on the 22 June, and its focus was on finalising arrangements for the TICOP. The first Council meeting took place on the 24 June, and 18 of the 26 adhering bodies were represented. The main topics were the business raised by the President and the Executive Director. They gave a broad overview about recent activities, collaborations with other institutions, upcoming tasks, as well as the IPA's budget. Also the different associated members, organisations and the IPA Action Groups and Standing Committees informed the Council about their work. During the meeting, the new Executive Committee was elected, which will govern the IPA for the next four years, and the new Executive Director was approved. Hanne Christiansen (Norway), Hugues Lantuit (Germany), Vladimir Romanovsky (USA), Lothar Schrott (Austria) and Ma Wei (China) were elected as Executive Committee members. The new President of the IPA, Antoni Lewkowicz (Canada), was automatically selected in 2010 when he was named Senior Vice-President at the Longyearbyen conference. Inga May will replace Hugues Lantuit as the Executive Director of the IPA. Between the first and the second Council meetings, the new Executive Committee gathered to discuss the resolutions of the conference and the most important steps for the coming four years. Hanne Christiansen and Vladimir Romanovsky were named Vice-Presidents, and a clause in the 2010 IPA Constitution regarding representation was used to add Dmitry Sergeev (Russia) to the Executive Committee. The outcomes of this meeting were presented at the second Council meeting which was held on 28 June. The most important agenda item was the vote for the location of the 11th International Conference on Permafrost in 2016. Lanzhou, China and Potsdam, Germany had submitted proposals and their national representatives had already presented their visions for the conference at the first meeting. The weighted vote was won by Germany with 35 votes out of 45. During this meeting, the conference resolutions were also defined, and Évora in Portugal was chosen as the location for the next Council meeting in 2014. The detailed minutes are published on the IPA website and can be found at http://ipa.arcticportal.org/publications/reports-and-minutes.html Feedback regarding the conference was positive and most participants were pleased to have attended. The logistics were certainly very challenging, involving among other things five charter flights from Moscow and Tyumen to bring the 500+ participants, organisers and facilitators to Salekhard. Because there was not a single big conference centre, but several smaller places where the scientific sessions took place, shuttle buses moving between the different locations and the hotels were required. Although the conditions for a smooth-running conference course were rather complicated, almost everything ran without problems and the conference was definitely a success for the permafrost community. Its lasting contribution will be in the contacts made and the proceedings volumes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.