Bibliographic record
Abstract
La etologia ha sido sin duda pionera en percibir en el “engano” un instrumento heuristico. Modelizando las perspectivas, reduciendo a una forma perceptiva minima el “mundo” de cada especie, el “metodo de los enganos” desarrollado por esta disciplina permite suponer que las percepciones del ser vivo pueden adoptar formas sensibles, residuales y esquematicas. ?Que ocurre con el engano tal y como se manifiesta en las sociedades humanas? ?Que nos ensena sobre la relacion de estas ultimas con su entorno, sobre sus propias representaciones y sensibilidades? Partiendo del ejemplo de los pescadores Imrâgen de Mauritania, en los que se han centrado mis investigaciones doctorales, y acudiendo a otras fuentes, literarias y etnograficas, relacionadas con el mar, el presente articulo trata de comprender como el engano y la intencion que esta en su principio: la metis, forman la trama de una relacion privilegiada con el mundo y sus seres. Palabras clave: Antropologia maritima- etologia- engano- sensibilidad
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".