MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1489604934 · doi:10.1609/aimag.v34i1.2456

The Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment

2013· article· en· W1489604934 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Riedl, Gita Sukthankar, Arnav Jhala, Jichen Zhu, Santiago Ontañón, Michael Buro, David G. Churchill

Bibliographic record

VenueAI Magazine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntertainmentCompetition (biology)Computer scienceEngineeringLibrary scienceMultimediaVisual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE) was held October 8–12, 2012, at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California. The conference included a research and industry track as well as a demonstration program. The conference featured 16 technical papers, 16 posters, and one demonstration, along with invited speakers, the StarCraft AI Competition, a newly introduced Doctoral Consortium, and five workshops. This report summarizes the activities of the conference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1360.063

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAI MagazineSame topicDigital Games and MediaFrench-language works237,207