MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1489690447 · doi:10.7202/1005628ar

Entre lyrisme esthétique et pessimisme culturel. Vincent Dieutre et les nouvelles voies autobiographiques de l’Europe

2011· article· fr· W1489690447 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laurent Guido

Bibliographic record

VenueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiques · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les images de routes et de rues sont des figures récurrentes du cinéma autobiographique contemporain, généralement structuré autour d’un parcours géographique (retour vers l’espace familial, découverte de lieux liés aux origines, déracinement qui entraîne l’errance, etc.) L’oeuvre de Vincent Dieutre propose notamment une vaste réflexion sur l’état de la culture occidentale à travers une série de récits de voyage : en Hollande et en Italie dans Rome désolée (1995), Bologna Centrale (2004) et Leçons de ténèbres (2000), ou encore en Allemagne avec Mon voyage d’hiver (2003). La complexité de ce réseau européen contraste vivement avec l’univers mythologique des avenues et des autoroutes américaines abordé par de nombreux prédécesseurs de Dieutre au cours des années 1970-1990. Marquée par une dialectique permanente entre lyrisme esthétique et pessimisme culturel, cette vision des rues et des routes d’Europe revisite les fondements mêmes du dispositif propre au film autobiographique : l’espace traversé par le voyageur se révèle le point de rencontre entre l’expérience individuelle, intime, narcissique et la référence plus universelle à une mémoire collective et historique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.016
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiquesSame topicFrench Literature and Critical TheoryFrench-language works237,207