La remise en eau de la plaine de Piolenc-Mornas face à la constitution d’une culture locale de l’arrangement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La plaine de Piolenc-Mornas (Vaucluse) est un ancien territoire inondable par le Rhône dont la reconquête est étudiée dans le cadre d’une étude d’optimisation de la gestion des zones d’expansion de crue. Au nom du principe de solidarité amont/aval, les gestionnaires envisagent la remise en eau de ce territoire, déjà marqué par de nombreuses infrastructures d’envergure nationale. Localement, les habitants ont appris à jouer avec les contraintes et les grands projets d’aménagement : quelle culture de l’arrangement se construit avec le temps au niveau local ? Au regard des enjeux du présent, comment la mémoire active du passé inondable de la plaine participe à la construction des représentations du territoire ? Comment toutes les pénétrantes en termes d’infrastructures ont participé à la transformation de la plaine rurale en une campagne moderne ? Enfin, comment le projet de remise en eau s’inscrit-il dans ce territoire ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".