MILP-Based Approach for Efficient Cloud IaaS Resource Allocation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current data center designs suffer from poor resource utilization. Several research works have addressed the data center resource allocation problem, and recent proposals have focused on network resource utilization as a bottleneck problem in data centers. However, little attention has been paid to manage the convergence of networking and other infrastructure resources. In this paper, we present a solution for improving data center's resource utilization. We introduce a unified cloud resource representation model and build a general resources repository using that model. We define a combined controller to manipulate infrastructure resources collected in the repository. A joint optimization model that performs the resource allocation as the main controller operation is also presented. This model represents the integration of semantic similarity and closeness centrality concepts and is formulated on a two-phase Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP-2P-IaaS): (i) mapping of hosting resources, and (ii) connectivity composition. Simulation results show that the (MILP-2P-IaaS) resource allocation approach improves data center's resource utilization and outperforms other benchmarks in terms of resource utilization and acceptance ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".