MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1489911455 · doi:10.1109/cloud.2015.152

MILP-Based Approach for Efficient Cloud IaaS Resource Allocation

2015· article· en· W1489911455 on OpenAlexaff
Khaled Metwally, Abdallah Jarray, Ahmed Karmouch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingResource allocationBottleneckData centerDistributed computingResource (disambiguation)Resource management (computing)ProvisioningController (irrigation)DatabaseComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current data center designs suffer from poor resource utilization. Several research works have addressed the data center resource allocation problem, and recent proposals have focused on network resource utilization as a bottleneck problem in data centers. However, little attention has been paid to manage the convergence of networking and other infrastructure resources. In this paper, we present a solution for improving data center's resource utilization. We introduce a unified cloud resource representation model and build a general resources repository using that model. We define a combined controller to manipulate infrastructure resources collected in the repository. A joint optimization model that performs the resource allocation as the main controller operation is also presented. This model represents the integration of semantic similarity and closeness centrality concepts and is formulated on a two-phase Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP-2P-IaaS): (i) mapping of hosting resources, and (ii) connectivity composition. Simulation results show that the (MILP-2P-IaaS) resource allocation approach improves data center's resource utilization and outperforms other benchmarks in terms of resource utilization and acceptance ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207