MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1489933137 · doi:10.1109/inm.2015.7140365

Monitoring and measurement in software-defined infrastructure

2015· article· en· W1489933137 on OpenAlexafffund
Jieyu Lin, Rajsimman Ravichandiran, Hadi Bannazadeh, Alberto Leon‐Garcia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTestbedComputer scienceScalabilityCloud computingVariety (cybernetics)SoftwareApplication lifecycle managementComponent (thermodynamics)System monitoringAnalyticsService (business)Network monitoringSoftware architectureSoftware engineeringDatabaseOperating systemWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Software-Defined Infrastructure (SDI) presents an approach for integrated management of virtualized heterogeneous resources. Monitoring and measurement is an essential component for effective control and management. This paper presents an architecture of a system, named MonArch, based on SDI that provides integrated monitoring and measurement functionalities. Unlike existing cloud and network monitoring systems, MonArch supports execution of user-generated monitoring tasks, offers monitoring as a service to tenants, administrators as well as management modules, and provides a framework for monitoring data analytics. We have implemented and deployed MonArch in the SAVI Testbed, and our experience shows the system is able to support a wide variety of monitoring tasks while achieving high performance and scalability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207