MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1489969108 · doi:10.1139/o06-042

Distinct bactericidal activities of bovine lactoferrin peptides LFampin 268–284 and LFampin 265–284: Asp-Leu-Ile makes a differenceThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 7th International Conference on Lactoferrin: Structure, Function, and Applications, and has undergone the Journal's usual peer review process.

2006· article· en· W1489969108 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marieke I.A. van der Kraan, Kamran Nazmi, Wim van ‘t Hof, Arie V. Nieuw Amerongen, Enno C.I. Veerman, Jan G.M. Bolscher

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStichting voor de Technische WetenschappenNederlandse Zuivel Organisatie
KeywordsLactoferrinCircular dichroismBacteriaPeptideGram-negative bacteriaPotencyGram-positive bacteriaMicrobiologyGramBiologyChemistryEscherichia coliBiochemistryIn vitroGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two lactoferrampin (LFampin) peptides derived from bovine lactoferrin were compared with respect to their bactericidal activities. LFampin 265-284 killed a set of Gram-positive bacteria that were resistant to LFampin 268-284. The presence of 265Asp-Leu-267Ile did not simply lead to an overall increased potency, since higher concentrations of LFampin 265-284 than LFampin 268-284 were needed to kill the Gram-negative bacteria that were tested. The Asp-Leu-Ile sequence enhances the propensity of LFampin to adopt an alpha-helix, as shown by circular dichroism spectroscopy. These results suggest that the helical conformation of the peptide is an important determinant of the susceptibility of Gram-positive bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicAntimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207