MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490110372 · doi:10.22146/jmh.16232

Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Bidang Penanggulangan Bencana

2012· article· id· W1490110372 on OpenAlex
Bayu Dwi Anggono

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada · 2012
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceLawBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Disaster Management Act was set forth to reduce the risk of looming disaster and to relieve the aftermath of an already-happened one. Since this Act relates with the other laws that govern natural resources, overlap and disharmony often arise. Therefore, synchronisation of this Act with sectoral laws is needed. Undang-undang Penanggulangan Bencana disahkan untuk mengurangi risiko terjadinya bencana serta memitigasi dampak bencana yang telah terjadi. Karena undangundang ini berkaitan erat dengan peraturan perundang-undangan lain yang mengatur sumber daya alam, tumpang tindih dan ketidakselarasan terjadi. Oleh karena itu, harmonisasi antara Undang-undang Penanggulangan Bencana dengan undangundang sektoral diperlukan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it