MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490145290

Investigation into phase quantization effects of synthesized array factor having a main beam and a scanning prescribed null using a linear array

2009· article· en· W1490145290 on OpenAlex
Mathieu Caillet, Michel Clénet, Yahia M. M. Antar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Conference on Antennas and Propagation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamwidthQuantization (signal processing)Null (SQL)PhysicsOpticsBeam (structure)Phase (matter)Beam steeringBeam diameterAngular displacementMathematicsAcousticsComputer scienceAlgorithmTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investigations into the phase quantization effects for a 16-element linear array with half-wavelength element spacing and digital phase shifters are reported in this article for an array factor having a main beam and a prescribed null. The main beam is fixed, and the prescribed null angular position varies between 1 and 60°. Based on results with perfect phase, the effects of phase quantization on the radiation characteristics are studied for several main beam positions. Particularly, one can notice that the main beam angular position and half-power beamwidth errors are similar to the results with exact phase. However, phase quantization greatly affects the prescribed null position and depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it