MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490408586 · doi:10.1002/yea.734

Molecular cloning of Ca<i>YRB1</i>, the <i>Candida albicans</i> RanBP1/YRB1 homologue

2001· article· en· W1490408586 on OpenAlexafffund
Martin Clément, Hélène Fournier, Ilia I. Ouspenski, Louis de Repentigny, Pierre Belhumeur

Bibliographic record

VenueYeast · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersPfizer CanadaPfizer
KeywordsBiologyCandida albicansGene productFungal proteinSaccharomyces cerevisiaeMutantGTPaseGeneCell biologyHomology (biology)YeastBiochemistryGeneticsMolecular biologyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The yeast Ran binding protein 1 (Yrb1p) is a small protein of 23 kDa that is highly conserved among eukaryotes. It stimulates the GTPase activity of Gsp1p in the presence of the GTPase activating protein Rna1p. In addition to its role in nucleocytoplasmic transport of macromolecules, YRB1/RanBP1 could be involved in the regulation of microtubules structure and dynamics. Since microtubules are tightly associated with morphological changes, we have been interested to study the role and function of YRB1 in the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans, where there is regulated change in cellular morphology. The gene product of CaYRB1 encodes a 212 amino acid protein displaying 73% homology to the S. cerevisiae homologue. The bacterially expressed gene product has an apparent molecular weight of 35.7 kDa. We show that it can complement a S. cerevisiae yrb1 null mutant and that its mRNA does not appear to be regulated in response to conditions inducing morphological changes in C. albicans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYeastSame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207