Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under the auspices of The Technical Cooperation Program, a Project Arrangement (PA) entitled Coalition Command Control and Communications Demonstration Environment (CC3DE) between the US, Australia and Canada was created and realized from 2000 to 2003. Those three nations collaborated on a Coalition Network Management System (CNMS) under the CC3DE PA. A new PA, entitled Policy Enabled Coalition Communications (PECC), will incorporate the United Kingdom and will iterate the design and concept of CNMS. As of this interim report, the PA still has not been signed due to export control language differences between nations. It is expected the PA will be signed by the end of 2006. Despite the limitation of an unsigned PA, AFRL has moved forward with in-house work on policy-based solutions for the coalition environment, to include: designing a modern service oriented architecture (SOA) for the coalition enterprise; identifying requirements for secure, cross-domain exchange of SOA protocols; begin design of reasoning resource monitors using semantic technology; and creating a NM protocol generator to test NM tool scalability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it