MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490562908

The Cast[e]ing of Heroic Landscapes of Power: Constructing Canada's Pantheon on Parliament Hill

2004· article· en· W1490562908 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brian S. Osborne, Geraint B. Osborne

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesParliamentCohesion (chemistry)EthnologyState (computer science)Power (physics)Collective identityPolitical scienceSociologyArtLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores Canada's strategy of nurturing a collective memory and social cohesion by the construction of a memorial-complex in the evolving capitol-capital complex. It called for the representation of national narratives in monumental forms, the construction and consecration of a symbolic topography, and the performance of identity through commemorative activities. It is argued here that the ever-expanding pantheon of national heroes on Parliament Hill is intended to materialize the abstract ideas of the nationalizing-state as they evolved through the trajectory of dependent-colony, imperial-nation, state-nation, and consensual community. That is, the cultivation of a collective memory grounded in a mythic past, reified in the present, and projected into the future. The question is posed whether such strategies are sensitive to Canada's role in a globalizing world. Resume Cet article se penche sur la strategie de construction d'un complexe commemoratif au sein d'un ensemble capitole-capitale en evolution, qu'a utilisee le Canada pour alimenter la memoire collective et favoriser la cohesion sociale. Cette strategie reposait sur la representation de recits nationaux sous forme de monuments, la construction et la consecration d'une topographie symbolique et la mise en scene de l'identite par des activites commemoratives. Les auteurs considerent que le pantheon toujours grandissant de heros nationaux sur la colline du Parlement a pour fin de materialiser les idees abstraites d'Etat nationalisâtes, qui ont evolue au fil des ans suivant la trajectoire menant de colonie dependante a nation imperiale, puis a nation-Etat et collectivite consensuelle. Il s'agit de la culture d'une memoire collective ancree sur un passe mythique, reifiee dans le present et projetee dans l'avenir. La question est maintenant de savoir si de telles strategies prennent en compte le role du Canada dans un contexte de mondialisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0320.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielleSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207