MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490910310

Understanding Ethnic Media: Producers, Consumers, and Societies

2011· article· en· W1490910310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nikhil Moro

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Educator · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobalization and Cultural Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupJournalismEntertainmentMainstreamSociologyMedia studiesLawPolitical scienceAnthropology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Matsaganis, Matthew D., Vikki S. Katz, and Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach, (2011). Understanding Ethnic Media: Producers, Consumers, and Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. pp. 314. Press theory can be complex: Who does or should press serve? What informs it? What sustains it? What goals drive it? In a classic essay published 1918, Hilaire Beloc, Catholic apologist, described press as capitalist in origin, evolution, and effect. Beloc wrote of the evil of great modern Capitalist Press, function in vitiating and misinforming opinion and in putting power into ignoble hands. In same breath, he offered its by formation of small independent organs, and probably increasing effect of these last (p. 1). That correction may have emerged nearly a century later in form of a colorful press. Today in United States live 57 million adult consumers who patronize some 3,000 outlets, according to New America Media, a San Francisco-based advocacy group. Ethnic-specific programming represents fastest growing sector of American journalism because of quickly diversifying demographic profile of many urban areas. It offers a counterweight to what critics such as Noam Chomsky and Robert McChesney have observed: that America's mainstream press is positioned to apologize for plutocracy of a few Goliaths, rather than to speak for any underdog. In complex milieu of press theory do Matsaganis and his fellow authors situate press. But two quick observations: First, book presents, for most part, a of media, not press. To this reviewer, media suggests that authors envisaged an institutional role that includes entertainment and socialization compared to the an institution of politics that tends to either operationalize a Meiklejohnian selfrule or advance state. Second, term ethnic is loaded in many ways. Using term can reflect a patronizing attitude in neo-dominant culture toward older and local traditions. It can connote a distinction, and hence exclusion, of local in cuisine, clothing, and festivity from presumed sophistication of an emerging mainstream. Ethnic can mean, as Merriam-Webster offers in first definition, heathen, who is an unconverted or uncivilized or irreligious person. In this book, authors do well to eschew stereotypical judgment. They define broadly to include by and for (a) immigrants, (b) ethnic, racial, and linguistic minorities, as well as (c) indigenous populations across different parts of world (p. xiii). They offer a succinct explication of that definition in chapters 1 and 2, emphasizing geographic context, roles of media, and a quick historical overview of press in Europe, America (including Native American and Chinese press), and Mexico. The book offers a rich smorgasbord of discussion, covering immigrants' media, minorities' media, audience trends, organizations, and policy development. Its eleven chapters and 314 pages present, ...a far-reaching review and analysis of how affect ongoing negotiations of self-identity, perceived lines of division between us and others, and how production and consumption of affects character of larger and societal landscape (p. xiii). It presents press, mostly in America but also in Mexico, France, and Canada, as not only a reflection but also a catalyst of societies that are rapidly heterogenizing by race, language, and national origin. The book includes twenty-five pages of references, six pages of author index, and fourteen pages of subject index. In addition to old-fashioned tables, attractive graphic elements jazz up pages. A very useful chapter objectives section precedes every chapter, and thoughtful sections titled summary, study questions (or case analysis questions), and notes conclude every chapter. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.017
Scholarly communication0.0160.037
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.314
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.051 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournalism & Mass Communication EducatorSame topicGlobalization and Cultural IdentityFrench-language works237,207