MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1491187047 · doi:10.1002/047147844x.wq38

Arsenic Compounds in Water

2004· other· en· W1491187047 on OpenAlexaff
Corinna Watt, X. Chris Le

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Encyclopedia · 2004
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenicEnvironmental chemistryBiogeochemical cycleGroundwaterArsenic contamination of groundwaterSmeltingEnvironmental sciencePopulationAquatic ecosystemInorganic arsenicChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Arsenic is the twentieth most abundant element in the earth's crust; it occurs naturally in the environment in both inorganic and organic forms. Arsenic is also released to the environment by anthropogenic activities such as pesticide use, wood preservation, mining, and smelting. Human exposure to arsenic by the general population occurs primarily from drinking water and food. In areas of endemic arsenic poisoning such as Bangladesh, India, Inner Mongolia, and Taiwan, the main exposure is through drinking water where inorganic arsenic levels can reach concentrations in the hundreds or thousands of micrograms per liter. The arsenic is released from natural mineral deposits into the groundwater in endemic areas. Groundwater is the primary drinking water source in these areas. Arsenic is present in a variety of inorganic and organic chemical forms in water. This is a result of chemical and biological transformations in the aquatic environment. The specific arsenic compound present determines its toxicity, biogeochemical behavior, and environmental fate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater EncyclopediaSame topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207