MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1491356860

Irregular Migrant Workers and Social Security

2012· article· en· W1491356860 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Law and Migration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial securityPolitical scienceWork (physics)Social workLabour lawSociologyPublic relationsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing number of irregular migrant workers, i.e. unlawfully or lawfully present foreigners who engage in employment although not legally authorized to do so, poses a challenge for national social security policy. The challenge is twofold. First, irregular work by foreigners is usually undeclared work, i.e. work for which no social security contributions and taxes are paid. Second, irregular migrant workers may be confronted with the realization of a social risk, such as the loss of income due to the birth of a child or the need for health care. This poses the question for social security of how to deal with people who have no authorization to work in the country, and possibly also no authorization to reside there. Preliminary investigations have shown that both legal science and national legislators struggle with this question.The research of Klaus Kapuy sought to contribute to the current legal discourse on the social security status of migrants in an irregular situation. It was the aim of the research to come up with suggestions on how to treat irregular migrant workers in national social security law by deploying a method which has not hitherto been used in legal research: an analysis of social security law itself. In order to understand the mechanisms of social security law better, the author has not only looked at the treatment of irregular migrant workers, but also at the treatment of a reference group. The reference group the author identified consists of nationals whose work is not declared to social security authorities. The comparison between irregular migrant workers and undeclared national workers has been conducted in three different countries (Belgium, Canada and the Netherlands). In order to better understand the results of the analysis of national law and to ascertain the legal limits of any proposal on the legal position of irregular migrant workers, the author also investigated the existing international legal framework in this field.This article summarizes the results of the doctoral research of Klaus Kapuy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it