MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1491381915 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005372

Oxygen therapy for exercise training or rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2005· reference-entry· en· W1491381915 on OpenAlexaff
ML Nonoyama, Deborah Brooks, Yves Lacasse, Roger Goldstein, G. H. Guyatt

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2005
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityWest Park Healthcare CentreToronto Western HospitalUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapySupplemental oxygenOxygen therapyCOPDPulmonary rehabilitationRehabilitationPulmonary diseaseExercise therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRandomized controlled trialInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To determine how oxygen therapy for exercise training (as part of rehabilitation) affects exercise capacity in individuals with COPD in comparison to control (compressed air or room air).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207