MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1491512592 · doi:10.1049/iet-spr.2010.0367

Robust equalisation for inter symbol interference communication channels

2012· article· en· W1491512592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Signal Processing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEqualiserChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceConstraint (computer-aided design)Intersymbol interferenceInterference (communication)Communications systemSymbol (formal)Transmission (telecommunications)Bit error rateAlgorithmNyquist ISI criterionStability (learning theory)Control theory (sociology)MathematicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of equalisation for communication channels with inter symbol interference (ISI) is investigated in this study. One practical yet challenging constraint for a channel with high transmission rate is incorporated into the modelling of the equalisation system: the communication channel is subject to uncertainties, which are assumed to be within a polytope with finite vertices. By using the augmentation method, the filtering error system of the equalisation problem is also characterised as a system with polytopic uncertainties. Sufficient conditions on the stability and the ℋ∞ performance for the filtering error system are obtained. A design method for the equaliser is proposed such that the filtering error system can achieve minimal ℋ∞ performance index even with the channel uncertainties. Two illustrative design examples demonstrate the design procedure and the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it