MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1491837085

Coordinated Primary Health Care for Refugees: A Best Practice Framework for Australia

2013· article· en· W1491837085 on OpenAlexaff
Grant Russell, Mark Harris, I‐Hao Cheng, Margaret Kay, Shiva Vasi, Chandni Joshi, Bibiana Chan, Winston Lo, Sayed Wahidi, Jenny Advocat, Kevin Pottie, Mitchell Smith, John Furler

Bibliographic record

VenueANU Open Research (Australian National University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeePrimary carePrimary health careBest practiceHealth careMedicinePolitical scienceNursingFamily medicineLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Australia permanently resettles over 20,000 refugees each year. Our team reviewed the international evidence and conducted new research to develop a framework for the delivery of accessible and coordinated primary health care to this vulnerable group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.130
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.111
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1300.111
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0140.012
Scholarly communication0.0210.014
Open science0.0140.029
Research integrity0.0200.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueANU Open Research (Australian National University)Same topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207